There’s been an interesting series of essays, and now projects, that focus on what scientists read and how it affects their work. While I know it has been an ongoing conversation in various venues for years, to my knowledge, the dialogue took on a new tone, and a new sense of urgency, with Neal Stephenson’s essay for the World Policy Institute in 2011, “Innovation Starvation”. The story was also published in Wired.
And now there appears to be an effort underway by New Scientist to study the phenomena of what scientists read.