Posts Tagged: digitalhumanities

note — Comments Off
11
Apr 12

Describing the “Digital Humanities”

As I have noted before, digital humanities is the merging of two areas of inquiry/activity that were once fairly distinct, humanities computing (also sometimes known as computational humanities) and digital media production. How and why the two got merged remains a larger history for someone else to unfold, but the folding appears to have occurred because they both take advantage of the immense processing powers of computers as both analytical devices, media production tools, and publishing platforms. A recent post on The Humanist by Sheffield University for their biennial Digital Humanities Congress has a nice formulation of all this:

Digital humanities is understood to mean the use of technology within arts, heritage and humanities research as both a method of inquiry and a means of dissemination. As such, proposals related to all disciplines within the arts, humanities and heritage domains are welcome.

The Humanist on-line seminar/mailing list archive is here.

work — Comments Off
11
Mar 12

McCarty’s Guide to Digital Humanities

Somewhat edited. I imagine it might serve as a building block for a list of my own making. More importantly, it serves as a decent lens onto what one of the major figures in the field considers “central.”

Articles, books, edited collections

  • McCarty, Willard. 2005. Humanities Computing. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • McGann, Jerome, ed. 2010. Online Humanities Scholarship: The Shape of Things to Come. Houston TX: Connexions. cnx.org/content/col11199/latest/
  • Schreibman, Susan, Ray Siemens and John Unsworth, eds. 2004. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell. www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/.
  • Williams, Raymond. 2003/1974. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. Ed. Ederyn Williams. London: Routledge.

Journals

  • Digital Humanities Quarterly (digitalhumanities.org/dhq/)
  • Literary and Linguistic Computing (llc.oxfordjournals.org/)

Conversations

  • Humanist (www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist/)
  • Blogs & Twitter: google for “blogs digital humanities”; “twitter digital humanities” or substitute the name of your primary discipline. Many fellow students and scholars are eager to help. Talk to them.

Guides &c

Experiment by googling for whatever subject-area interests you, e.g. “digital history”; for courses, e.g. “digital humanities syllabus”.

Organizations

Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations (www.digitalhumanities.org)

Updates

  • Cohen, Dan and Scheinfeldt, Tom. Hacking the Academy. (University of Michigan Press, 2011) [web; print forthcoming]
  • Gold, Matthew K. *Debates in the Digital Humanities *(University of Minnesota Press, 2012)
  • Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Planned Obsolescence (NYU Press, 2011)
  • Kirschenbaum, Matthew. *Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination *(MIT Press, 2007)
  • Nowviskie, Bethany.* alt-academy*. (MediaCommons, 2011) [web]
  • Ramsay, Steve. Reading Machines: Towards an Algorithmic Criticism (University of Illinois Press, 2011)

Forthcoming titles to look out for:

  • David Berry’s Understanding Digital Humanities (Palgrave, 2012)
  • Katherine Hayles, How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis (Chicago UP, 2012)
  • Matthew Jockers, *Macroanalysis: Methods for Digital Literary History *(Illinois, forthcoming).
work — Comments Off
20
Feb 12

Speaking of his work for the Index Thomisticus, Robert Busa noted:

If I consider the vast amount of human work demanded by processing texts of this size in this way, I think that such initiatives are better based on a strongly systemized team, supported by an institution able to keep alive its efficiency for decades. (117)

Busa, Robert. 1970. Computer processing of over ten million words: Retrospective Criticism. In The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Studies (Proceedings of the Third International Symposium), 114-117. Ed. Alan Jones and R. F. Churchhouse. University of Wales Press.

work — Comments Off
2
Feb 12

THATCamp

UL should host a THATCamp.

work — Comments Off
17
Jan 12

Evaluating Digital Work for Tenure and Promotion: A Workshop for Evaluators and Candidates at the 2012 MLA Convention . Good to see that the title of the session is longer than the URL.

work — Comments Off
15
Jan 12

John Anderson reminded me of the power of such alternate groupings of people and foci as One Week, One Tool. Thanks, John.

work — Comments Off
22
Nov 11

If one wants the computer to produce a new type of humanities, one shouldn’t look to computing, but mathematics, for that answer. That is, a new humanities would require a mathematical theory of the humanities which then the computer could implement. Expecting the computer to be the basis for a new humanities without the humanities having a computable theory is like waiting for construction tools to cause the creation of a new building architecture. –Bob Amsler

work — Comments Off
1
Nov 11

Towards a Digital Humanities Major

The Humanist mailing list is currently entertaining a discussion about what a digital humanities major for undergraduates might look like. It’s an interesting discussion, although it begs the question of what the digital humanities actually are and, so far, it seems like the computer scientists and mathematicians are weighing in to say something like “You humanists need more math and computer science.” I don’t doubt that’s true, but I don’t really hear mathematicians and computer scientists saying something like “Say, you know what, this thing that’s happening in the humanities makes us realize we need a better humanities curriculum for our majors.”

C’est la vie.

Here are some of the parameters currently being discussed for a major:

  • One year of discrete mathematics (or calculus). I would argue for linear algebra, given my own experiences.
  • One year of a programming language. Does this include Python, Ruby, et alum?
  • Knowledge of markup languages and stylesheets: XML, HTML, CSS. (Sometimes PHP is included here.)
  • Some knowledge of databases. The nature of that knowledge is somewhat undefined yet. SQL? MySQL? Etc.
work — Comments Off
28
Sep 11

Digital Humanities Jobs by the Numbers

Desmond Schmidt of Queensland University of Technology did some data mining in the Humanist archives and compiled the following numbers for digital humanities jobs:

2002: 11
2003: 6
2004: 15
2005: 15
2006: 18
2007: 24
2008: 27 (incomplete – 1/2 year)
2009: 36
2010: 58
2011: 65 so far

Breakdown by country:
US: 133
GB: 65
CA: 35
IE: 18
DE: 13
FR: 8
IL: 3
NO: 2
NL: 2
ES: 2
AT: 1
AU: 1
BE: 1

Normalised by population:
IE: 4.0
GB: 1.051779935
CA: 1.038575668
US: 0.433224756
NO: 0.416666667
IL: 0.405405405
DE: 0.158924205
FR: 0.127795527
NL: 0.121212121
AT: 0.119047619
BE: 0.092592593
AU: 0.04587156
ES: 0.043572985

work — Comments Off
20
Sep 11

Digital Humanities Courses

I was lucky enough to teach our university’s first digital humanities course last year. It was a graduate-level seminar, but it was still very much an introduction. I am okay with this leveling of the playing field in the early days of our own exploration of the digital humanities domain, but I am hoping we can developing a more rigorous curriculum — well, I am hoping for a curriculum first! — in the years to come. It is with thanks, then, that I cite the following instances of digital humanities courses being offered and discussed around the web:

  • Brian Croxall has made his course’s development and deployment very public. The course itself has its own WordPress site. (This is hosted on Croxall’s own server. Surely Emory could support this?)
  • Paul Fyfe has not only taught a digital humanities course, but he had his students respond to the question “what is digital humanities?” and then made their responses public — after checking with them first. Here’s the link.
work — Comments Off
1
Aug 11

Digital Humanities Setups

I think it would be fun to replicate The Setup for the digital humanities. From the About page: “The Setup is a collection of nerdy interviews, asking people from all walks of life about the software and hardware they use.”

Of course, the real coolness is that Daniel Bogan shares the code that runs The Setup. (It’s Ruby.)

work — Comments Off
10
Jul 11

Topic Modeling in Mallet

Topic Modeling in Mallet

work — Comments Off
19
Apr 11

Iter: Gateway to the Middle Ages and the Renaissance

I am not sure what to think of the many portals to content that are springing up everywhere. First, it’s great. So much information so lovingly curated. (Well, okay, sometimes it’s a poorly pushed together pile.) On other hand, I worry about all these terrific structures resembling so many silos on a landscape: here’s some data, and here’s some data, and here’s some data, but getting a bit of data from each at the same time (in the same search) is not possible. This is a central concern of Project Bamboo, but it’s not the one getting initial attention — and yet it would make a huge difference and have, I think, immense visibility.

The Iter Gateway seems to have gotten a lot of things right. I can’t figure out what they used to build it — Drupal? It could have been Omeka.

work — Comments Off
14
Jan 11

Accidental Genius

I just finished a long post to the digital humanities seminar about free writing, which they will be doing, and the internet. I mentioned Mark Levy’s Accidental Genius, from which I will be drawing for some of our free writing techniques, and my quick search to turn up a link both to the book and to his website, turned up this wonderful article from Wired, entitled “Accidental Genius” which recounts how the law of unintended consequences has worked out for several inventions:

  • Gunpowder was meant to prolong life (as a pill).
  • The mechanical clock’s intended use was to regulate monastic prayer.
  • Edison developed the phonograph to record telephone calls.
  • Viagra was developed to help with angina.
work — Comments Off
7
Jan 11

“Digital Humanism” at the Samsung Keynote at CES

Uh oh. It appears that digital humanism has arrived and it wasn’t in an MLA keynote, but one at CES, where Samsung’s president B. K. Yoon asked yesterday afternoon:

How can we take digital humanism a step further? How do we envision the future of our digital devices? These are the questions I struggle with on a daily basis … Digital humanism is adding emotional value to digital technology.

Later in the presentation, Yoon noted:

We are committed to Human Digitalism. We are committed to putting human life at the center of everything we do.

And the video behind him had the same sequence. Did he mean that the first time instead of “digital humanism”? Are they the same thing?

Engadget has complete coverage but my advice is to click on “sort oldest first” so you can read their coverage in chronological order. I don’t know that it will make any more sense that way.

← Older Entries